A usability study of passkey-based authentication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37431/conectividad.v7i2.429Keywords:
Passwordless authentication, Passwords, User experience, Cybersecurity, System usability scaleAbstract
Traditional passwords present critical limitations in usability and security, with reuse rates exceeding 60% and elevated cognitive fatigue among users. Passkeys, implemented under FIDO2/WebAuthn standards, emerge as a passwordless alternative based on public-key cryptography. To comparatively evaluate usability and perceived satisfaction between passkeys and traditional passwords through quantitative evidence in a Latin American university context. Controlled experimental study with between-subjects design (n=30 university participants, mean age=21.4 years) randomly assigned to two groups during a one-week testing period. The System Usability Scale (SUS), demographic questionnaire, and Likert-type satisfaction questions were administered. Analysis included non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U) and Spearman correlations. Passkeys obtained a mean SUS score of 83.2 (SD=5.04), significantly higher than traditional passwords (71.8, SD=2.2). Overall satisfaction and ease of use were higher for passkeys (8.53 and 8.86 respectively) versus passwords (7.73 and 7.46). Correlations between satisfaction-SUS (ρ=0.41) and ease-SUS (ρ=0.35) were moderate-weak. Passkeys demonstrate significant advantages in usability and acceptance, constituting a viable alternative to replace passwords in commercial applications, particularly among young populations with moderate technological experience.
References
Abdrabou, Y., Abdelrahman, Y., Khamis, M., & Alt, F. (2021). Think Harder! Investigating the Effect of Password Strength on Cognitive Load during Password Creation. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451636
Arias Cabarcos, P. & Meyer, P. (2025). ‘The more accounts I use, the less I have to think’: A Longitudinal Study on the Usability of Password Managers for Novice Users. USENIX Proceedings of the Twenty-First Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. August 11–12, 2025 • Seattle, WA, USA. https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2025/presentation/cabarcos
Ashish, N., Jeong, J. J., Shah, S. W. A., Nosouhi, M., & Doss, R. (2024). Examining usable security features and user perceptions of Physical Authentication Devices. Comput. Secur., 139(C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103664
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry (pp. 189–194). London: Taylor & Francis.
Feinberg, S., & Murphy, M. (2000). Applying cognitive load theory to the design of Web-based instruction. IPCC/SIGDOC ’00: Proceedings of IEEE Professional Communication Society International Professional Communication Conference and Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM International Conference on Computer Documentation: Technology & Teamwork, 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2000.887293
FIDO Alliance. (2023). Passkeys: Passwordless Authentication. https://fidoalliance.org/specifications/
Grawemeyer, B., & Johnson, H. (2011). Using and managing multiple passwords: A week to a view. Interacting with Computers, 23(3), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.03.007
Kennesaw State University (2025). An Investigation on Users' In-category Password Reuse Behavior. Coles College of Business Working Paper Series, 5. https://campus.kennesaw.edu/colleges-departments/coles/research/docs/spring-2025/spring-2025-05.pdf
Lyastani, S. G., Schilling, M., Neumayr, M., Backes, M., & Bugiel, S. (2020). Is FIDO2 the Kingslayer of User Authentication? A Comparative Usability Study of FIDO2 Passwordless Authentication. 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), San Francisco, CA, USA, 2020, pp. 268-285, doi: 10.1109/SP40000.2020.00047. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9152694
Mujeye, S. (2016). An Experimental Study on the Role of Password Strength and Cognitive Load on Employee Productivity [Doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University]. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1962&context=gscis_etd
Owens, K., Anise, O., Krauss, A., & Ur, B. (2021). User Perceptions of the Usability and Security of Smartphones as FIDO2 Roaming Authenticators. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. August 9–10, 2021, 57–76. https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2021/presentation/owens
Reese, K., Smith, T., Dutson, J., Armknecht, J., Cameron, J., & Seamons, K. (2019). A Usability Study of Five Two-Factor Authentication Methods. USENIX Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. August 12–13, 2019, Santa Clara, CA, USA. https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2019/presentation/reese
Ruoti, S., Andersen, J. M., Zappala, D., & Seamons, K. E. (2016). Why Johnny Still, Still Can’t Encrypt: Evaluating the Usability of a Modern PGP Client. USENIX Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1510.08555
Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2016). Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research (2nd ed). Morgan Kaufmann.
Suria, O. (2024). A Statistical Analysis of System Usability Scale (SUS) Evaluations in Online Learning Systems. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 6(2), 997–1004. https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v6i2.750
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Instituto Superior Tecnológico Universitario Rumiñahui

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The originals published in the electronic edition under the first publication rights of the journal belong to the Instituto Superior Tecnológico Universitario Rumiñahui; therefore, it is necessary to cite the source in any partial or total reproduction. All the contents of the electronic journal are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0) license.


2.png)





