Trends and evolution of research in strategic management: A bibliometric analysis of Latin American output in Scopus (2015–2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37431/conectividad.v7i2.424Keywords:
Strategic management, Bibliometrics, Latin America, Co-autorship networks, Intellectual structureAbstract
This study characterizes the trends, intellectual structure, and collaborative networks of Latin American research in strategic management (Scopus, 2015–2025). A quantitative bibliometric design was applied: advanced search in Scopus with inclusion criteria for articles and reviews in administration and economics; corpus refinement and standardization; and analysis with Bibliometrix (R) and VOSviewer on productivity, sources, keyword co-occurrence, and co-authorship. The final corpus comprised 805 documents. The results show sustained growth peaking in 2024 and high geographical concentration: Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico account for the highest production; institutionally, the University of São Paulo leads. Regional journals predominate in volume, while international forums (e.g., Technological Forecasting & Social Change and Strategic Management Journal) concentrate citations. The intellectual map reveals four clusters: (i) fundamentals and performance; (ii) innovation and entrepreneurship (including SMEs); (iii) sustainability and social responsibility; and (iv) context and governance. Co-authorship networks show a core-periphery pattern, with Brazil as the regional hub and Spain/Portugal and the United States as extra-regional bridges associated with greater impact. It is concluded that the field is consolidating; selective internationalization and consortia are recommended, recognizing the use of a single database and the time frame as limitations.
References
Andrade-Valbuena, N. A., Valenzuela-Fernández, L., & Merigó, J. M. (2022). Thirty-five years of strategic management research. A country analysis using bibliometric techniques for the 1987-2021 period. Cuadernos de Gestion, 22(2), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.211441na
Archambault, É., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the web of science and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1320–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21062
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Baena-Luna, P., García-Río, E., & Monge-Agüero, M. (2020). Entrecomp: Competent framework for entrepreneurship. A systematic review of the literature on its use and application. Información Tecnológica, 31(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642020000200163
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Brookes, B. C. (1985). “Sources of information on specific subjects” by S.C. Bradford. Journal of Information Science, 10(4), 173–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158501000406
Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2016). Multilatinas as a new kind of multinational companies. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 29(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-03-2015-0046
Diaz Tautiva, J. A., Rifo Rivera, F. I., Barros Celume, S. A., & Rifo Rivera, S. A. (2024). Mapping the research about organisations in the latin american context: a bibliometric analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 74(1), 121–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00296-3
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2021). Foreign direct investment in Latin America and the Caribbean 2021. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/e1a399b3-en
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf
G.F.S. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 202(2), 271. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-0032(26)91166-6
Gantman, E. R. (2017). El desarrollo de los estudios críticos de gestión en los países latinoamericanos de habla hispana. Politica y Sociedad, 54(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.5209/POSO.51679
Garrido, C. (2019). Empresas multinacionales de América Latina: Estrategias de internacionalización y desarrollo. Siglo XXI Editores.
Grant, R. M. (2021). Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts. In 11th (Ed.), Techniques, Applications (Vol. 4). John Wiley & Sons. http://www.blackwellpublishing.com
Groos, O. V., & Pritchard, A. (1969). Documentation notes. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 344–349. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026482
Hernández, R., & Mendoza, C. (2020). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. In McGRAW-HILL Interamericana Editores S.A. de C.V. McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
Khan, M. A. (2023). Mapping the intellectual structure of international business strategy: a bibliometric review. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 33(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2023.128761
Li, Z., Sun, Y., & Li, L. (2022). Corporate sustainability strategy research: a bibliometric analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01452-9
Morales Marenco, M. J., Westjohn, S., & Gupta, V. K. (2023). Journey to ‘El Dorado’: Finding Latin American Riches in Management and Organizational Research. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2023(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/amproc.2023.18363abstract
Nag, R., Hambrick, D. C., & Chen, M. J. (2007). What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal, 28(9), 935–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.615
Porter, M. E. (1996). What Is Strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78. https://hbr.org/1996/11/what-is-strategy
Reyes-Sarmiento, M. E., & Rivas-Montoya, L. M. (2019). Strategizing: Opening New Avenues in Latin-America. A Systematic Literature Review. AD-Minister, 35, 165–193. https://doi.org/10.17230/ad-minister.35.7
Rivera-Rodríguez, H. A., Beltrán Duque, A., & Sánchez-López, J. C. (2025). What characterizes strategy research in Latin America? A bibliometric analysis for the 1990–2023 period. Journal of Management History, 31(1), 174–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-12-2023-0129
Rondón-Ríos, M. A., Marín-Idárraga, D. A., & Vela-Acosta, C. S. (2021). Producción científica en Administración en Colombia: un análisis bibliométrico (2009-2019). Cuadernos de Administración, 34. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cao34.pcac
Shultz, C., Pels, J., Barrios Fajardo, A., & Rodriguez, C. (2024). Macromarketing Perspectives from Latin America. Journal of Macromarketing, 44(3), 690–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467241260405
Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Wheelen, T. L., Hunger, J. D., Hoffman, A. N., Bamford, C. E., & Kansal, P. (2002). Strategic Management and Business Policy: Globalization, Innovation and Sustainability, by Pearson (15th (ed.)). Pearson.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Instituto Superior Tecnológico Universitario Rumiñahui

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The originals published in the electronic edition under the first publication rights of the journal belong to the Instituto Superior Tecnológico Universitario Rumiñahui; therefore, it is necessary to cite the source in any partial or total reproduction. All the contents of the electronic journal are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0) license.

2.png)





