Simulation software as a tool for the analysis of automotive steel structures

Abstract

The research focuses on analyzing the use of simulation software in the analysis of automotive metallic structures, with the objective of identifying the advantages and differences between various tools to optimize vehicle design and efficiency. The qualitative methodology employed includes an exhaustive analysis of papers, academic articles, case studies and technical sources related to the topic, as well as interviews with industry experts. Criteria  such as accuracy of results, nonlinear capabilities, usability, cost, and cloud access of eight simulation softwares are evaluated. This research reveals a competitive landscape led by ANSYS, NASTRAN and COMSOL, standing out for their accuracy (100%, 93%, 93% respectively) and pioneering analysis methods (100%, 100%, 93%). Abaqus and LS-Dyna, although highly accurate (93%, 100%), present advanced-intermediate methods. HyperWorks excels in optimization (100%) and ease of use (93%), while SolidWorks offers low cost (93%) and compatibility with AnyCAD (100%). SimSolid, with low hardware requirements (93%) and exceptional ease of use (100%), shows limitations in analysis and optimization (86%, 79%). In conclusion, FEM simulation software currently prioritizes accuracy, innovation and efficiency, with increasing use of the cloud for remote access and collaboration.